PPC Magic
Comparison

Google Ads vs Microsoft Ads (Bing Ads)

This isn't really an either/or question. Google is where most searches happen, so it should be your main search channel. The real question is whether Microsoft Advertising deserves a slice of your budget. For most businesses, it does.

Janis BrixBy Janis Brix, Founder & Senior PPC Consultant · Reviewed September 2026
Most search volume, main channel
Google Ads
Cheaper clicks, less competition
Microsoft Ads
Typical share of search budget for Microsoft
10-25%

The short answer

Use Google Ads as your main search channel: it has by far the most volume. Add Microsoft Ads once Google is working, typically with 10-25% of your search budget. Microsoft clicks are often cheaper, its audience leans desktop and professional, and it offers LinkedIn profile targeting that Google can't match.

Google AdsMicrosoft Ads
Search reachThe large majority of searchesBing, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, AOL, Copilot and partners
Cost per clickHigher in most industriesOften lower: fewer serious advertisers
AudienceEveryone; heavily mobileLeans desktop, work computers, older and higher-income
B2B targetingKeywords and audiences onlyLinkedIn company, industry and job function targeting
Campaign typesSearch, PMax, Shopping, Display, YouTube, Demand GenSearch, PMax, Shopping, Audience ads
Setup effortFull buildCan import from Google, then needs its own tuning
Tools and automationMore advanced, more dataGood, slightly behind Google

Why Google should be your main search channel

Google handles the overwhelming majority of searches in most countries. It has more data, so its smart bidding generally has more to learn from, and it covers far more inventory: YouTube, Gmail, Discover, Maps and the Display Network. If you only run one search platform, it should be Google.

Why Microsoft is still worth adding

Microsoft's smaller share is exactly why it's worth having. Fewer advertisers bid seriously, so clicks are often cheaper for the same keyword. And the people searching on Bing are disproportionately at work on Windows PCs using Edge, which suits B2B, finance, legal, healthcare and considered purchases.

Then there's LinkedIn profile targeting. Microsoft owns LinkedIn, and lets you adjust search bids based on the searcher's company, industry or job function. Google has nothing equivalent on search.

  • Typically adds extra conversion volume on top of Google at a similar or lower cost per conversion
  • Quick to launch by importing your Google campaigns
  • Useful as a hedge if Google costs rise in your market

Who gets the most from Microsoft Ads?

Microsoft Ads tends to work well for

  • B2B companies selling to office-based professionals
  • Financial services, insurance, legal and healthcare
  • Businesses whose customers skew 35+ or higher income
  • Accounts already maxing out profitable Google volume

It matters less for

  • Brands selling mainly to under-25s on mobile
  • Accounts where Google isn't profitable yet
  • Very small local budgets (fix Google first)
  • Businesses without time or help to manage a second account

How to split your budget

Start Microsoft at around 10-25% of your Google search budget, with the same core keywords and negatives. Give it a month or two, then compare cost per conversion and lead quality side by side. If it's performing, keep scaling until you run out of search volume, which tends to happen sooner on Microsoft than on Google.

One practical tip: import from Google to save setup time, then switch off scheduled imports. Otherwise every Google change overwrites your Microsoft-specific settings. Our Microsoft Ads management page covers how we run it.

FAQ

Common questions

Something we haven't covered? Ask us directly.

Not better, different. Google has much more volume. Microsoft often has cheaper clicks and a more professional audience. Most businesses should run Google first and add Microsoft as a profitable extra.

Want numbers for your own account?

Send us your website and budget. We'll look at your market and your account (if you have one), then tell you what we'd expect to spend, what we'd expect back, and what we'd fix first.