PPC Magic
B2B comparison

Google Ads vs LinkedIn Ads for B2B

For B2B marketers this is the big one. Google finds people searching for a solution; LinkedIn finds the exact people who should be buying it, whether they're searching or not. Here's how the two compare and how to split a B2B budget between them.

Janis BrixBy Janis Brix, Founder & Senior PPC Consultant · Reviewed September 2026
Best for capturing active demand
Google Ads
Best for reaching exact job titles and accounts
LinkedIn Ads
The usual B2B answer once budget allows
Both

The short answer

If buyers search for your category, start with Google Ads: it's usually the cheapest source of high-intent B2B leads. Add LinkedIn Ads when you need to reach specific roles or accounts who aren't searching yet, or when your deal values are high enough to justify $10+ clicks. Most B2B companies above about $10,000 a month in ad spend use both.

Google AdsLinkedIn Ads
TargetingSearch keywords, plus audiencesJob title, function, seniority, company, industry, size, skills
Buyer intentHigh: they're searchingLow to medium: they're browsing their feed
Typical CPC$3-$30 for B2B terms$6-$15+
Typical cost per leadOften $50-$250Often $75-$350
Lead qualityHigh intent, but anyone can searchRight person, earlier stage
Best offersDemos, quotes, pricing, trialsReports, benchmarks, webinars, assessments
Minimum realistic budget$1,500-$3,000/month$3,000-$5,000/month

When a head of operations searches "warehouse management software for 3PLs", they're telling you exactly what they need. Google Ads puts you in front of them at that moment. It's the most direct route to pipeline in B2B, and usually the cheapest per qualified lead.

The catch is that Google can't tell you who's searching. A student, a competitor and a buyer at your perfect customer all type the same words. Good negative keywords, qualifying landing pages and CRM-based conversion tracking fix most of that.

LinkedIn Ads: the right people, earlier

LinkedIn's advantage is precision. You can show ads only to IT directors at healthcare companies with 500+ employees, or to a list of 200 target accounts. For account-based marketing and complex sales with several decision makers, nothing else comes close.

The trade-off is price and timing. Clicks cost more, and most people you reach aren't in-market today. LinkedIn works best with offers that are useful before someone's ready to buy (research, benchmarks, events) and with patience for longer sales cycles.

Which should you start with?

Start with Google Ads if…

  • People search for your product category or problem
  • Your budget is under about $5,000 a month
  • You need leads soon and have a sales team ready
  • Your deal size is modest (a few thousand a year)

Start with LinkedIn Ads if…

  • Your category is new and nobody searches for it yet
  • You sell to a defined list of target accounts
  • Deal values are high enough to justify $10+ clicks
  • You need to reach several roles in the buying committee

How Google and LinkedIn work together

  1. 1

    LinkedIn builds awareness in target accounts

    Useful content and thought leadership in front of the exact roles you sell to.

  2. 2

    Google captures them when they search

    When those people start looking, your brand is familiar, which lifts click-through and conversion rates.

  3. 3

    Retarget cheaply

    Website visitors from either channel can be retargeted on LinkedIn, Google and Meta.

  4. 4

    Measure on pipeline

    Connect your CRM so both platforms are judged on opportunities and revenue, not form fills.

FAQ

Common questions

Something we haven't covered? Ask us directly.

Google usually gives cheaper, higher-intent leads when buyers search for your category. LinkedIn is better for reaching specific roles and accounts. Most successful B2B programmes use both.

Want numbers for your own account?

Send us your website and budget. We'll look at your market and your account (if you have one), then tell you what we'd expect to spend, what we'd expect back, and what we'd fix first.